Hemiaster

Clockwise from lower left, (a) aboral, (b) oral, (c) lateral and (d) posterior views of Hemiaster bufo, from Fischer (1966).

Belongs within: Hemiasterina.

Hemiaster is a genus of broad and high heart urchins known from the Lower Cretaceous to the present (Fischer 1966).

Hemiaster: an echinoid with heart
Published 8 October 2012

For today’s post subject, I’ve drawn the echinoid genus Hemiaster. Hemiaster is a member of the group of echinoids known as heart urchins, in reference to their overall shape when viewed from above. Species of Hemiaster are also fairly deep, so their overall shape when viewed from the side is somewhat reminiscent of a hoof. Heart urchins mostly live burrowed into sediment (mud, in the case of Hemiaster). One notable feature compared to other echinoids is that they have lost the Aristotle’s lantern, the ‘jaw’ structure found in regular echinoids. Heart urchins are detritivores feeding on organic matter either buried in sediment or deposited on the surface of their substrate. The specific habits of living Hemiaster species seem to be poorly known, due to their living in deep-water habitats, but an Atlantic specimen of H. expergitus has been found living in a 12 cm deep burrow with a narrow funnel opening to the surface (Gage 1987).

In order to maintain their burrows, heart urchins have exceedingly long and well-developed tube feet, the openings for which in the test are visible as a petal-shaped pattern (and I must expose my ignorance, here: before I started looking up stuff for this post, I had always assumed that the petaloid pattern on heart urchins was on the underside. It is, in fact, on the aboral side). Also characteristic of heart urchins are fascioles, bands of closely-crowded tiny spines covered with cilia, that are believed to function in respiration by increasing water flow over themselves (a necessary process when the respiratorily available surface of the animal has been mostly buried by mud) (Fischer 1966). In Hemiaster, the only fasciole present runs around the space occupied by the petaloids; other heart urchins may have different patterns of fascioles on different parts of the body.

Cretaceous Hemiaster whitei, from here.

Fossils attributed to Hemiaster date back as far as the Cretaceous, and it appears to be better known as a fossil than a living animal. This is not entirely unusual for echinoderms: I have a vague recollection of Chris Mah, who works on living echinoderms, complaining about this very point, but I can’t recall exactly where/when he did so (sorry, Chris!). Still, in some justification, Hemiaster was more diverse in the past than it is now: of the seven subgenera recognised in Hemiaster by Fischer (1966), only the nominotypical subgenus survives to the present, and none of the others postdates the Palaeocene.

Systematics of Hemiaster

Characters (from Fischer 1966): Test broad, high relative to length, abruptly truncated in rear, showing slight frontal sinus; apical system ethmophract, with four gonopores; frontal ambulacrum nonpetaloid or semipetaloid, with small round pores; paired ambulacra having relatively short petals, frontal pair longest.

<==Hemiaster Agassiz 1847 [incl. Leucaster Gauthier in Peron 1887, Peroniaster Gauthier 1887, Perionaster (l. c.)]F66
    |  i. s.: H. baixadoleitensis (Maury 1934) [=Spatangus baixadoleitensis]SG93
    |         H. cavernosusD05
    |         *Peroniaster’ cotteaui Gauthier 1887F66
    |         H. expergitusPG98
    |           |--H. e. expergitusPG98
    |           `--H. e. gibbosusPG98
    |         H. positaH79
    |         *Leucaster’ remensis Gauthier 1887F66
    |         H. texanusF66
    |--H. (Hemiaster) [incl. Integraster Lambert & Thiéry 1924 non Döderlein 1920]F66
    |    |--*H. (H.) bufo (Brongniart 1822) [=Spatangus bufo]F66
    |    `--H. (H.) ligeriensis d’Orbigny 1853 [=H. (*Integraster) ligeriensis]F66
    |--H. (Bolbaster Pomel 1869)F66
    |    `--H. (*B.) prunella (Lamarck 1816) [=Spatangus prunella]F66
    |--H. (Gregoryaster Lambert 1907)F66
    |    `--H. (*G.) coranguinum (Gregory 1892) [=Pericosmus coranguinum]F66
    |--H. (Holanthus Lambert & Thiéry 1924)F66
    |    `--H. (*H.) hickmanni Koehler 1914F66
    |--H. (Leymeriaster Lambert & Thiéry 1924)F66
    |    `--H. (*L.) leymeriei Agassiz 1847F66
    |--H. (Mecaster Pomel 1883)F66
    |    `--H. (*M.) fourneli Agassiz in Agassiz & Desor 1847F66
    `--H. (Trachyaster Pomel 1869)F66
         `--H. (*T.) globosus (Pomel 1869) [=*Trachyaster globosus]F66

*Type species of generic name indicated

References

[D05] Döderlein, L. 1905. Arktische Seeigel. In: Römer, F., & F. Schaudinn (eds) Fauna Arctica. Eine Zusammenstellun der arktischen Tierformen, mit besonder Berücksichtigung des Spitzbergen-Gebietes auf Grund der Ergebnisse der Deutschen Expedition in das Nördliche Eismeer im Jahre 1898 vol. 4 pp. 373–394. Gustav Fischer: Jena.

[F66] Fischer, A. G. 1966. Spatangoids. In: Moore, R. C. (ed.) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology pt U. Echinodermata 3 vol. 2 pp. U543–U628. The Geological Society of America, Inc., and The University of Kansas Press.

Gage, J. D. 1987. Growth of the deep-sea irregular sea urchins Echinosigra phiale and Hemiaster expergitus in the Rockall Trough (N.E. Atlantic Ocean). Marine Biology 96: 19–30.

[H79] Haast, J. von. 1879. Geology of the Provinces of Canterbury and Westland, New Zealand. A report comprising the results of official explorations. “Times” Office: Christchurch.

[PG98] Probert, P. K., & S. L. Grove. 1998. Macrobenthic assemblages of the continental shelf and upper slope off the west coast of South Island, New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 28: 259–280.

[SG93] Simms, M. J., A. S. Gale, P. Gilliland, E. P. F. Rose & G. D. Sevastopulo. 1993. Echinodermata. In: Benton, M. J. (ed.) The Fossil Record 2 pp. 491–528. Chapman & Hall: London.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *