Pleurotomella (Pleurotomella)

Pleurotomella packardii, copyright Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History.

Belongs within: Raphitomidae.

The type subgenus of the genus Pleurotomella is a group of thin-shelled conoids found in deep ocean basins with the greatest diversity in the North Atlantic (Powell 1966).

Deep Pleurotomella
Published 23 March 2016
The type species of Pleurotomella, P. packardi, copyright Forum Natura Mediterraneo.

‘Turrid’ time again! Though the disassembly of the enormous mass that was the old gastropod family Turridae (now several families of the superfamily Conoidea) has left the subject of today’s post, the genus Pleurotomella, as a member of the Raphitomidae rather than the Turridae. Pleurotomella is a widespread genus, with species found in deeper parts of ocean basins around the world. As with many deep-water animals, we know relatively little about their lifestyles, though they are undoubtedly predators like other conoids. Like other conoids, Pleurotomella species have a radula with the teeth modified into hypodermic syringes for the injection of toxins. At least some species (including the type) are blind (Bouchet & Warén 1980) and I can imagine that they attack relatively sedentary prey such as worms.

Taxonomically speaking, Pleurotomella has one of those histories that can make a grown taxonomist just want to sit down and cry. I’ve already mentioned this horrible genus in my earlier post on Asperdaphne as a player in one of those scenarios where a misunderstood type species leads a genus to jettison almost all of the species previously associated with it and pick up a whole bunch of new ones that it never held before. An inordinate number of deep-water ‘turrid’ species seem to have been dumped into Pleurotomella at some time or other, many of which are probably only remotely related to the true Pleurotomella. However, since Bouchet & Warén (1980) redescribed the type species Pleurotomella packardi as part of a revision of north-east Atlantic ‘turrids’, we have much better grounds for the genus’ recognition (Beu 2011). Species of Pleurotomella have strongly inflated whorls that are evenly rounded except for a concave ‘ramp’ below the suture between whorls. The shell contracts rapidly to a narrow base, and has prominent, sharp and often curved axial ridges.

Multispiral (left) and paucispiral (right) protoconches of Mangelia species, from Bouchet (1990). Scale bars = 200 µm.

Again as was the case in the Asperdaphne post, a notable factor in the taxonomic complications of Pleurotomella has been matters relating to the protoconch, the larval shell that remains perched throughout development at the tip of the post-larval shell, the teleoconch. Because the features of the protoconch such as ornamentation may often differ from those of the teleoconch, it can often be of significance in gastropod taxonomy. A lead proponent of the importance of the protoconch in ‘turrid’ taxonomy was the New Zealand malacologist A. W. B. Powell who produced an influentiall classification of turrids between the 1940s and 1960s. Nevertheless, Powell did note an interesting phenomenon: the common existence of ‘genus pairs’ that were all but indistinguishable in teleoconch morphology but very distinct in their protoconches. Because Powell regarded the teleoconch as phylogenetically less significant than the protoconch (in accord with Ernst Haeckel’s old dictum that ontogeny should recapitulate phylogeny), he concluded that these ‘genus pairs’ must represent separate lineages converging on a single adult morphology.

More recent authors agree that, in this, Powell was wrong (Bouchet 1990). As noteworthy a source of taxonomic characters it may be, protoconch development is subject to selective and evolutionary pressures just as much as teleoconch development. The most regular difference between Powell’s ‘genus pairs’ is that one would have a conical protoconch with a number of whorls (say three or four, referred to as multispiral) whereas the other would have a stubby round protoconch with at most about one-and-a-half whorls (paucispiral). This difference in protoconch morphology reflects a difference in how the larval shell is fed. In the original development path for gastropods, eggs hatch out to planktic larvae that feed themselves on other plankton (planktotrophy) before eventually settling and developing to maturity. However, many conoids (and other gastropods) have evolved eggs that have a large yolk; the developing embryos obtain their energy from the reserves in the yolk (lecithotrophy) and bypass the planktic stage, hatching directly as benthic crawlers. Because planktotrophs need their larval shell for longer than lecithotrophs, it becomes more developed; planktotrophs are multispiral, lecithotrophs are paucispiral. Powell’s ‘genus pairs’ did not represent separate lineages evolving similar adult lifestyles, but members of the same lineage tackling early development different ways. As such, and because of the possibility that the change between planktotrophic and lecithotrophic development may have occured multiple times within a single group, most recent authors would not automatically recognise multispiral and paucispiral species as separate genera. Pleurotomella species mostly have multispiral protoconches, but some (including P. packardi and a number of Pacific species) have paucispiral ones.

Which is not to say that protoconch morphology has become irrelevant. Bouchet & Warén (1980) did maintain the genus Neopleurotomoides as separate from Pleurotomella on the basis of protoconch morphology, despite these two genera having very similar teleoconches. In this case, the difference is not just the number of spirals in the protoconch, but its ornamentation. Pleurotomella species with a multispiral protoconch have a cancellate (cross-hatch) pattern of ridges covering it, but Neopleurotomoides has a sparser ornament of one or two spiral keels crossed by axial ribs. The distinction between the two genera remains problemematic: species with a paucispiral protoconch (which is usually more or less unornamented) cannot be readily assigned to either genus, and there are many ‘Pleurotomella’ species for which the protoconch remains undescribed. But the take-away lesson, as so often in taxonomy, is this: no source of characters should be ignored, but nor should it be fetishised.

Systematics of Pleurotomella (Pleurotomella)

Characters (from Powell 1966): Shell of small, moderate or large size, 4–75 mm, rather thin, broadly biconic to ovate, usually with conspicuously angulated whorls. Protoconch of 3–4.5 whorls, narrowly conical to turbinate, either diagonally cancellated, or closely axially ribbed, crossed by spiral threads. Adult sculpture of flexuous protractive fold-like axials, usually thickened over peripheral area. Shoulder sulcus closely axially ribbed, arcuately protractive, following curve of sinus. Whole surface crossed by spiral cords and threads, weaker over shoulder sulcus. Spire of equal height or greater than that of aperture plus canal. Body-whorl capacious, excavated somewhat over neck. Outer lip thin-edged with deep sutural sinus, rounded at its apex which is at or above middle of shoulder slope, merged below into great forward swing of lower outer lip. Ovate-pyriform aperture terminating in short flexed, spout-like anterior canal. Inner lip smooth callused, without processes. Colour white, often covered by pale olive periostracum. Operculum absent.

<==Pleurotomella Verrill 1873 (Pleurotomella) [incl. Azorita Nordsieck 1968]BK11
    |--*P. (P.) packardii Verrill 1872BR17 (see below for synonymy)
    |--P. (P.) anceyi (Dautzenberg & Fischer 1897)P66 [=Pleurotoma anceyiBW80, Azorita anceyiBW80]
    |--P. (P.) araneosa (Watson 1881) [=Pleurotoma (Defrancia) araneosa]P66
    |--P. (P.) bandella (Dall 1881) [=Pleurotoma (Mangilia) bandella; incl. Pleurotoma diomedeae Verrill & Smith 1884]P66
    |--P. (P.) benedicti Verrill & Smith 1884P66, BW80 [=P. packardi benedictiP66]
    |--P. (P.) bulbulina (Locard 1897) [=Mangilia bulbulina]P66
    |--P. (P.) bureaui (Dautzenberg & Fischer 1897)P66 (see below for synonymy)
    |--P. (P.) cala (Watson 1886) [=Clathurella cala]P66
    |--P. (P.) catherinae Verrill & Smith 1884P66
    |--P. (P.) circumvoluta (Watson 1881) [=Pleurotoma (Defrancia) circumvoluta]P66
    |--P. (P.) coeloraphe (Dautzenberg & Fischer 1896)P66, BW80 [=Pleurotoma coelorapheBW80]
    |--P. (P.) demosia (Dautzenberg & Fischer 1896)P66 [=Pleurotoma demosiaBW80; incl. Mangilia bulbulinula Locard 1897BW80]
    |--P. (P.) eurybrocha (Dautzenberg & Fischer 1896)P66 (see below for synonymy)
    |--P. (P.) filifera (Dall 1881) [=Pleurotoma (Bela) filifera]P66
    |--P. (P.) herminea Dall 1919P66
    |--P. (P.) lottae Verrill 1885P66
    |--P. (P.) oceanida Dall 1919P66
    |--P. (P.) pandionis Verrill 1880P66
    |--P. (P.) papyracea (Watson 1886) [=Pleurotoma (Thesbia) papyracea]P66
    |--P. (P.) perpauxilla (Watson 1881) [=Pleurotoma (Defrancia) perpauxilla]P66
    |--P. (P.) porcellana (Watson 1886) [=Clathurella porcellana]P66
    |--P. (P.) pudens (Watson 1881) [=Pleurotoma (Defrancia) pudens]P66
    |--P. (P.) puella Thiele 1925P66
    |--P. (P.) sandersoni Verrill 1884P66
    `--P. (P.) simillima Thiele 1912P66

Pleurotomella (Pleurotomella) bureaui (Dautzenberg & Fischer 1897)P66 [=Pleurotoma bureauiBW80, *Azorita bureauiBW80; incl. Mangilia sericifila Dall 1927BW80]

Pleurotomella (Pleurotomella) eurybrocha (Dautzenberg & Fischer 1896)P66 [=Pleurotoma eurybrochaBW80; incl. Defrancia implicisculpta Sturany 1896BW80, Pleurotomella lineola Dall 1927BW80]

*Pleurotomella (Pleurotomella) packardii Verrill 1872BR17 [incl. Pleurotoma formosa var. curta Locard 1897BW80, Pleurotoma diastropha Dautzenberg & Fischer 1896BW80, Pleurotomella diastrophaP66, Pleurotomoides diastrophaBW80, Pleurotoma formosa Jeffreys 1883BW80, Defrancia formosaP66, Pleurotomella formosaP66, Pleurotomella saffordi Verrill & Smith 1884BW80]

*Type species of generic name indicated

References

Beu, A. G. 2011. Marine Mollusca of isotope stages of the last 2 million years in New Zealand. Part 4. Gastropoda (Ptenoglossa, Neogastropoda, Heterobranchia). Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 41 (1): 1–153.

Bouchet, P. 1990. Turrid genera and mode of development: the use and abuse of protoconch morphology. Malacologia 32 (1): 69–77.

[BK11] Bouchet, P., Y. I. Kantor, A. Sysoev & N. Puillandre. 2011. A new operational classification of the Conoidea (Gastropoda). Journal of Molluscan Studies 77: 273–308.

[BR17] Bouchet, P., J.-P. Rocroi, B. Hausdorf, A. Kaim, Y. Kano, A. Nützel, P. Parkhaev, M. Schrödl & E. E. Strong. 2017. Revised classification, nomenclator and typification of gastropod and monoplacophoran families. Malacologia 61 (1–2): 1–526.

[BW80] Bouchet, P., & A. Waren. 1980. Revision of the north-east Atlantic bathyal and abyssal Turridae (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Journal of Molluscan Studies Supplement 8: 1–119.

[P66] Powell, A. W. B. 1966. The molluscan families Speightiidae and Turridae: an evaluation of the valid taxa, both Recent and fossil, with lists of characteristic species. Bulletin of the Auckland Institute and Museum 5: 1–184, pls 1–23.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *