Rosalinidae

Rosalina globularis, from Buzas & Severin (1982).

Belongs within: Rosalinida.

Lifestyles of the Rosalinidae
Published 13 February 2022

Among the modern foraminiferans, one of the most prominent radiations is among members of the Rotaliida, characterised by globose chambers and calcareous, hyaline test walls. Among the numerous families making up the Rotaliida are members of the Rosalinidae.

Benthic form of Rosalina globularis, from Brady (1884).

Rosalinids may be regarded as fairly typical-looking marine rotaliids with the test growing freely as a low trochospire (so a flattened cone or dish shape). The aperture of the test is a low slit on the interior margin along the umbilicus (Hansen & Revets 1992). Rosalinids have a complex life cycle involving both benthic and planktonic stages (Sliter 1965). The asexually reproducing diploid stage is benthic. Depending on conditions, diploid individuals may divide to produce other diploid individuals, resulting in several asexual generations. Eventually, however, the diploid generation will undergo meiosis to produce the haploid sexual generation (in the common species Rosalina globularis, this is induced by exposure to warmer water). In the sexual generation, a large globular chamber forms at maturity that covers the umbilical side of the test. This float chamber becomes filled with gas, allowing the foram to disperse planktonically before releasing gametes to produce the next diploid generation. Planktonic individuals are distinct enough in appearance from their benthic counterparts that they were long mistaken for distinct taxa before their identity was revealed by lab cultures.

Life cycle of Rosalina globularis, from Sliter (1965).

The majority of forams are particulate feeders. A network of filamentous pseudopodia radiating outwards from the cell body captures micro-organisms and other organic particles. However, one genus of rosalinids, Hyrrokkin, lives as parasites on sessile invertebrates (Cedhagen 1994). Species of this genus have variously been found on sponges, corals and bivalves. On sponges, they settle on the inhalent surface of the sponge and dissolve the underlying tissues. On bivalves, they form pits on the shell surface from which they bore holes through to the body cavity. Pseudopodia extended through this hole allow the foram to feed on host tissue. Infested hosts may bear multiple scars from the foram moving about on the outer surface. The forams may also feed on other animals such as polychaete worms or bryozoans attached to the surface of their primary host. In such cases, Hyrrokkin remains in its original pit but develops an irregularly shaped chamber with its aperture directed towards the alternate prey. Hyrrokkin species evidently do well from their rapacious lifestyle: whereas other rosalinids are only a fraction of a millimetre in diameter, Hyrrokkin sarcophaga is an absolute giant reaching around six millimetres across and with protoplasm containing thousands of nuclei. Proving once again that one may make a great deal of profit from the labour of others.

Cross-section of Hyrrokkin sarcophaga boring into shell of file clam Acesta excavata, from Schleinkofer et al. (2021).
Systematics of Rosalinidae
<==Rosalinidae [Conorbinidae]M13
|--Albertinopsis Revets 2002M13
|--Topalodiscorbis Neagu 1970HW93
|--Conorbina Brotzen 1936M13
| `--*C. marginata Brotzen 1936C40
|--Discanomalina Asano 1951AB19, LT64
| |--*D. japonica Asano 1951LT64
| `--D. semipunctataLJ98
|--Rosalina d’Orbigny 1826 (see below for synonymy)LT64
| |--*R. globularis d’Orbigny 1826LT64 [=Discorbis globularisH03, *Turbinolina globularisLT64]
| |--R. adhaerens Murray 1965C94
| |--R. anglica (Cushman 1931)A68
| |--R. atlantica (Hofker 1956) [=Gavelinopsis atlantica]LT64
| |--R. australis (Parr 1932)A68
| |--R. bertheloti d’Orbigny 1839A68 [=*Discopulvinulina berthelotiLT64, Discorbinella berthelotiLT64]
| |--R. bradyi (Cushman 1915) [=Discorbis globularis var. bradyi]H03
| |--R. concinnaJW99
| |--R. floridana (Cushman 1922)C94
| |--R. inflata (Hornibrook 1961) [=*Semirosalina inflata]LT64
| |--R. villardeboana d’Orbigny 1839H03 [=Discorbis villardeboanusM62]
| `--R. ystadiensis Brotzen 1948C94
`--Hyrrokkin Cedhagen 1994C94
|--*H. sarcophaga Cedhagen 1994C94
`--H. carnivora (Toddy 1965) [=Rosalina carnivora]C94

Rosalina d’Orbigny 1826 [=Turbinolina d’Orbigny in de la Sagra 1839; incl. Discopulvinulina Hofker 1951, Semirosalina Hornibrook 1961]LT64

*Type species of generic name indicated

References

[AB19] Adl, S. M., D. Bass, C. E. Lane, J. Lukeš, C. L. Schoch, A. Smirnov, S. Agatha, C. Berney, M. W. Brown, F. Burki, P. Cárdenas, I. Čepička, L. Chistyakova, J. del Campo, M. Dunthorn, B. Edvardsen, Y. Eglit, L. Guillou, V. Hampl, A. A. Heiss, M. Hoppenrath, T. Y. James, A. Karnkowska, S. Karpov, E. Kim, M. Kolisko, A. Kudryavtsev, D. J. G. Lahr, E. Lara, L. Le Gall, D. H. Lynn, D. G. Mann, R. Massana, E. A. D. Mitchell, C. Morrow, J. S. Park, J. W. Pawlowski, M. J. Powell, D. J. Richter, S. Rueckert, L. Shadwick, S. Shimano, F. W. Spiegel, G. Torruella, N. Youssef, V. Zlatogursky & Q. Zhang. 2019. Revisions to the classification, nomenclature, and diversity of eukaryotes. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 66: 4–119.

[A68] Albani, A. D. 1968. Recent Foraminiferida of the central coast of New South Wales. AMSA Handbook 1: 1–37.

[C94] Cedhagen, T. 1994. Taxonomy and biology of Hyrrokkin sarcophaga gen. et sp. n., a parasitic foraminiferan (Rosalinidae). Sarsia 79: 65–82.

[C40] Cushman, J. A. 1940. Foraminifera: Their classification and economic use 3rd ed. Harvard University Press: Cambridge (Massachusetts).

[H03] Hanagata, S. 2003. Miocene–Pliocene Foraminifera from the Niigata oil-fields region, northeastern Japan. Micropaleontology 49 (4): 293–340.

Hansen, H. J., & S. A. Revets. 1992. A revision and reclassification of the Discorbidae, Rosalinidae, and Rotaliidae. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 22 (2): 166–180.

[HW93] Hart, M. B., & C. L. Williams. 1993. Protozoa. In: Benton, M. J. (ed.) The Fossil Record 2 pp. 43–70. Chapman & Hall: London.

[JW99] Jian, Z.-M., L.-J. Wang, M. Kienast, M. Sarnthein, W. Kuhnt, H.-L. Lin & P.-X. Wang. 1999. Benthic foraminiferal paleoceanography of the South China Sea over the last 40,000 years. Marine Geology 156: 159–186.

[LJ98] Li, Q., N. P. James, B. McGowran, Y. Bone & J. Cann. 1998. Synergetic influence of water masses and Kangaroo Island barrier on foraminiferal distribution, Lincoln and Lacepede shelves, South Australia: a synthesis. Alcheringa 22 (2): 153–176.

[LT64] Loeblich, A. R., Jr & H. Tappan. 1964. Sarcodina: chiefly “thecamoebians” and Foraminiferida. In: Moore, R. C. (ed.) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology pt C. Protista 2 vol. 2. The Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas Press.

[M13] Mikhalevich, V. I. 2013. New insight into the systematics and evolution of the Foraminifera. Micropaleontology 59 (6): 493–527.

[M62] Monniot, F. 1962. Recherches sur les graviers a Amphioxus de la région de Banyuls-sur-Mer. Vie et Milieu 13: 231–322.

Sliter, W. V. 1965. Laboratory experiments on the life cycle and ecologic controls of Rosalina globularis d’Orbigny. Journal of Protozoology 12 (2): 210–215.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *